From dbaaf1259825bd4522fd28b09c07fe6c1bc2b672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Cannam <cannam@all-day-breakfast.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:13:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Hm, those settings weren't as well-behaved as I thought. I
 wonder if there is some unpleasant randomness here

---
 src/dsp/Resampler.cpp | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/dsp/Resampler.cpp b/src/dsp/Resampler.cpp
index ac1f8eb..c6ad53c 100644
--- a/src/dsp/Resampler.cpp
+++ b/src/dsp/Resampler.cpp
@@ -155,10 +155,9 @@ D_IPP::D_IPP(Resampler::Quality /* quality */,
         cerr << "Resampler::Resampler: using IPP implementation" << endl;
     }
 
-    int nStep = 16;
+    m_window = 32;
+    int nStep = 64;
     IppHintAlgorithm hint = ippAlgHintFast;
-    m_window = 48;
-    nStep = 80;
     m_factor = 8; // initial upper bound on m_ratio, may be amended later
 
     // This is largely based on the IPP docs and examples. Adapted