Hm, those settings weren't as well-behaved as I thought. I wonder if there is some unpleasant randomness here
This commit is contained in:
@@ -155,10 +155,9 @@ D_IPP::D_IPP(Resampler::Quality /* quality */,
|
|||||||
cerr << "Resampler::Resampler: using IPP implementation" << endl;
|
cerr << "Resampler::Resampler: using IPP implementation" << endl;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int nStep = 16;
|
m_window = 32;
|
||||||
|
int nStep = 64;
|
||||||
IppHintAlgorithm hint = ippAlgHintFast;
|
IppHintAlgorithm hint = ippAlgHintFast;
|
||||||
m_window = 48;
|
|
||||||
nStep = 80;
|
|
||||||
m_factor = 8; // initial upper bound on m_ratio, may be amended later
|
m_factor = 8; // initial upper bound on m_ratio, may be amended later
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// This is largely based on the IPP docs and examples. Adapted
|
// This is largely based on the IPP docs and examples. Adapted
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user